<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good v Bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tomhowe.org/blog/2009/07/21/good-v-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tomhowe.org/blog/2009/07/21/good-v-bad/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:45:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LWIII</title>
		<link>http://tomhowe.org/blog/2009/07/21/good-v-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-3773</link>
		<dc:creator>LWIII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomhowe.org/blog/?p=887#comment-3773</guid>
		<description>Boy, there&#039;s a question for you, or three of them. My main problem with good and bad is that I&#039;m not sure how to tell the difference sometimes. I sure seem to have different criteria than many of my friends and associates.

That&#039;s one of the battles of good and evil, which is which? Most often it depends on which side of the fence you&#039;re on. Evil is defined more by how you were raised than any objective criteria. That&#039;s how it seems to me, in many cases.

Pain is bad, sometimes, except when it&#039;s good.

Thanks for the comment, bro!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, there&#8217;s a question for you, or three of them. My main problem with good and bad is that I&#8217;m not sure how to tell the difference sometimes. I sure seem to have different criteria than many of my friends and associates.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one of the battles of good and evil, which is which? Most often it depends on which side of the fence you&#8217;re on. Evil is defined more by how you were raised than any objective criteria. That&#8217;s how it seems to me, in many cases.</p>
<p>Pain is bad, sometimes, except when it&#8217;s good.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment, bro!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Bradley</title>
		<link>http://tomhowe.org/blog/2009/07/21/good-v-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-3768</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tomhowe.org/blog/?p=887#comment-3768</guid>
		<description>Does one really even exist without the other? Could you recognize good in the absence of bad? And is it always clear which one something is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does one really even exist without the other? Could you recognize good in the absence of bad? And is it always clear which one something is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

